Talk:XACML
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 March 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Moved Obligations out of the "New in XACML 3.0" section, since Obligations have been in XACML long before. 94.136.86.20 (talk) 15:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Ground-breaking work
[edit]"The implementation of delegation is new in XACML 3.0, following ground-breaking work by Butler Lampson and a number of other successful research projects which prototyped the concept" - the cited reference is from 1991. The statement is a bit misleading, and it's not quite clear what exactly they prototyped. --JensMueller (talk) 09:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
As the citation appears irrelevant here (XACML did not exist in 1991) I would suggest that this citation is removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.154.222.237 (talk) 06:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
A simple description
[edit]This subject needs a simple description added for the less technical people looking for a an answer to "what is it??" Back ache (talk) 11:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
External Links section
[edit]This section misses a number of XACML compliant products, e.g. ObjectSecurity OpenPMF (www.openpmf.com)75.61.130.18 (talk) 04:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Examples can be misunderstood
[edit]Using intuitive language to describe the XACML examples conceals the fact that XACML is a highly complex format and language - better show the full XACML file that implements each of the example.75.61.130.18 (talk) 04:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Time-based Authorization in XACML
[edit]AnyOf seems not right when a time frame is given as a requirement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.111.105.94 (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Not a manual
[edit]Did a bold cleanup, Wikipedia is not a tech manual. Rm unsourced material. Add formatting. // Timothy :: talk 06:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, you deleted a lot of relevant content that I spent years putting together. I do not understand why history, architecture, and design have been removed for XACML but are still very much present on other pages like OAuth and SAML. David (talk) 17:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- As a result another user came in and added the details you had removed but made mistakes. Rules cannot contain multiple conditions. This is horrendous. David (talk) 17:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)