Talk:Wounded Knee Occupation
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wounded Knee Occupation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independent Oglala Nation
[edit]@Nikkimaria Could I ask why you believe the infobox on the independent oglala nation "does not belong here at all" Genabab (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- This is the article about the event, so the event template is more appropriate. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Nikkimaria The issue is, the reason it belongs here is because it is appropriate for the section talking about the creation of the independent oglala state. If not here, where else would the state infobox be? Genabab (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- If the state is notable, in a dedicated article. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- That's not how other articles handle it. Take the page for the history of Libya under Gaddafi. It has two different state infoboxes contained within it. So precedent dictates that the state infobox should be used here.
- + Its important to include as it demonstrates the seriousness of what was being done in Wounded Knee by showing that such a state was created. Removing it serves to minimise the history of Wounded Knee and its occupation Genabab (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- If the state is notable, in a dedicated article. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- That article would benefit from being edited too. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Okayy. What about the rest? Like, the 2nd half of the point. @Nikkimaria Genabab (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- That article would benefit from being edited too. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- As above, if the state itself is notable, it should get an article - that would demonstrate its seriousness. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:13, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- B-Class South Dakota articles
- Mid-importance South Dakota articles
- B-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Mid-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- B-Class United States History articles
- Mid-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles