Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Wooga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Spintendo in topic Some proposed changes

It's the biggest social games developer in Europe

[edit]

Why should this be "speedy deleted"? wooga is the biggest social games developer in Europe, after that Playfish was purchased by EA.


by Startoz

Nothing in the article establishes this as a notable company. Nothing in the article supports your claim that this is the biggest social games developer in europe. And there are no references to the company that aren't its own website. Hence, it would appear to qualify for Speedy Deletion. Cheers. Bagheera (talk) 14:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
References have been added that appear to back up an assertion of notability. Any deletion discussion from this point would need to take place at AfD. Acroterion (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Don't really agree with the references showing Notability, at least not with what's there so far, but I'm not going to worry about an AfD. Cheers. Bagheera (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Puzzle Bobble clones on FB? - Yura87 (talk) 12:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

[edit]

It seems that the first such game was Wooga's Bubble Island, seeing which succeed led King.com to introduce Bubble Witch Saga, first of its games brought to social networks, which led to Zynga and others releasing their own Puzzle Bobble clones. Therefore, Bubble Safari gotta be of less note than Bubble Island.

Some proposed changes

[edit]

Information to be added or removed:

2A02:8109:9B40:7A4:D942:1653:53F8:6C2 (talk) 18:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reply 24-SEP-2019

[edit]

  Edit request partially implemented  

  1. Green tick The Company structure section was omitted.
  2. Green tick The Reception and impact section was omitted.
  3. Red X The Portfolio section was not added, as it was not referenced.
  4. Red X The lead section was not replaced, as it contained unencyclopedic information including the company's aims, as well as subjective descriptions of the company's products using Wikipedia's voice.
  • If the COI editor receives, or expects to receive, compensation for any contribution they make, they must disclose their employer, client, and affiliation to comply with Wikipedia's terms of use and the policy on paid editing.

Regards,  Spintendo  20:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


Some proposed changes

[edit]

Information to be added or removed: