Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Wolfdog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vehvilæinen in topic Admixture Improper Citation

Untitled

[edit]

Most wolf dogs are matings of 2 wolf dogs. It’s very rare for a wolf and a dog to be mated these days. Also it’s illegal most places to own a pure wolf. Requesting revision of article to reflect this information.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Bweddlern (talkcontribs) 09:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Breed-specific legislation

[edit]

Alberta's legislation does not prohibit a person from owning a hybrid of a wolf and a dog. Under provincial law, wolves are classified as furbearing animals and so cannot be kept as pets, but wolf / dog crosses can be legally possessed without special permits. Tracylee1971 (talk) 03:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I second this. Wolfdogs are legal in Alberta, even without a permit. One reference is: https://www.hybridlaw.org/canada/. 2605:59C8:1523:9610:F9B5:7983:DD6:A843 (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 22 September 2022

[edit]

92.22.140.255 (talk) 14:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Top 6 Dogs that Look Like Wolves

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 16:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

wolfdog

[edit]

wolfdogs are smart and stupid and a kid made this by the way WARNIG its not... 199.243.186.122 (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Admixture Improper Citation

[edit]

The first paragraph under the "Admixture" subheading claims that a range of experts have been unable to reliably identify wolfdogs, but the cited source does not claim that. The first half of the cited book section is the author bragging about his epic courtroom wins, and the second half has the author actually talk about wolfdog misidentification, but the author only mentions one supposed wolfdog expert who they claim has a history of misidentification. There is no extrapolation or claim in the cited section that misidentifcation of wolfdogs among supposed experts is a widespread issue. Jcreeggan (talk) 17:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree. From a practical point of view that shouldn't be the second sentence in the article either... Vehvilæinen (talk) 11:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply