Talk:Winds Code
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by Ruairi lynch in topic CYA?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
CYA?
[edit]Is it really necessary to add "CYA" to the end of the article. It makes it look so much less professional, too bad I can't think of anything better to say.
Agreed. Reads better. Apologies to the author, but taken the liberty of removing that comment. an attempt at CYA.[citation needed] Ruairi lynch (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Blunder rather than Conspiracy
[edit]Much of the content here is supported in The American Century. Harold Evans. Jonathan Cape 1998 pp312-313 - more in connection with the concept that the attacks on Pearl Harbor were the result of widespread Roosevelt administration & Defence blunders rather than a conspiracy. Ruairi lynch (talk) 16:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class intelligence articles
- Intelligence task force articles
- Start-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles