Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Windows Push Notification Service/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Carbrera in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 16:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


Infobox

[edit]
  • The image of the "Overview of the WNS architecture" needs an alt image description; please add one

Lead

[edit]
  • Remember: Anything that is mentioned in the lead needs to be mentioned in the article; the facts about "it was first supported on Windows 8 and subsequently on Windows Phone 8.1 upon its release." is cited wonderfully here, but it needs to be brought up in the article as well
  • Same with Reference #2 please

Technical details

[edit]

Design and compatibility

[edit]
  • No source for the "The service changes are expected to be released alongside an anniversary update to Windows 10." statement

Architecture

[edit]
  • Great work; nothing to add!

References

[edit]
  • The "Reflist" parameters should be changed to "Reflist|30em"; please do this to prevent extra space in this section
  • Overlinking issues:
  • Reference #2 – Unlink "Microsoft" please
  • Reference #3 – Unlink "Microsoft" please
  • Reference #8 – Unlink "Microsoft" please

End of GA Review:

[edit]

Short and sweet: a good and quick read! Great work! The article will be placed on hold for seven days to allow for any changes to be made. If you have a question for me regarding this review, feel free to @PING me and I'll respond and I'm sure I will respond swiftly. Thanks! Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC).Reply

Hi Carbrera - I've had a go at fixing the issues you've identified - any further feedback would be welcome! Mike1901 (talk) 21:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your quick response; quick's the wrong word–more like immediate (a whopping 17 minutes!) I have passed the article now and appreciate your improvements. Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC).Reply