Talk:WinShell

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Microsoft Windows (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should this be in quotations and have a reference to the winshell website ? Everything here is all but entirely a *direct* quotation from that site... Granted, it's pretty basic and common nonsense about the program itself, but all the same... -ARAaronRosenberg 00:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

changelog necessary?

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

is the exact nature of the changes noteworthy? i don't think so. someone delete it. 84.153.206.241 (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ok done gioto (talk) 04:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

References/Notability

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am afraid that the recently added references are not sufficient to support notability - significant coverage in reliable sources is required. A directory listing and a book don't cut it, so this one's headed to Afd. – ukexpat (talk) 14:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled

changelog necessary?

References/Notability