Talk:We Need Answers

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

BBC (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Television: British Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Comedy Mid‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This show seems to have run its course

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Shall I past tense everything? Martyn Smith (talk) 17:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Draft:No More Jockeys

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I expanded on User:CursoryBethany's draft article at Draft:No More Jockeys in light of the YouTube channel's success since launch, but months after I submitted it for review someone gave it another boilerplate rejection. I assume the problem is that it only has one strong source (the Esquire article), so if anyone can name another, please add it to the draft and resubmit. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

I actually think it probably works better as a redirect to the section on this page about No More Jockeys, which could then be given a quick line about how it began during the development of We Need Answers. Patr2016 (talk) 17:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

This show seems to have run its course

Draft:No More Jockeys