Talk:WLRM
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Programming
[edit]Without debating the relative merits of the SPLC, Newsweek is a well-accepted reliable source and describes the show as "white-supremacist" as opposed to "white nationalist". I have updated the sourcing and language accordingly. - Dravecky (talk) 05:33, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Many reliable sources do not list the Political Cesspool as a "white-supremacist" show, nor does the website of the program itself. They refer to themselves as "conservative" and "populist."
A new article published in Sweden's Fria Tider, which is six years more recent than the Newsweek article, labels them as "paleoconservative."
http://www.friatider.se/skranig-vansterkritik-efter-intervju-med-nationalistisk-radio
During James Edwards' (Cesspool host) appearances on CNN, he has always been introduced as a "conservative talk radio host." I think CNN is a reliable source.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OJiQxjO0Q4E#!
View the video and scroll to the 4:50 mark to see CNN desrcibe the Political Cesspool as a "conservative radio program."
If it can't be agreed that this show is "white-supremacist" or "conservative" let's just not refer to it as either and let people view it and draw their own conclusions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.226.119.116 (talk) 15:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Fact check: Institute for Historical Review has not been a sponsor of Political Cesspool since 2007. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.242.190.110 (talk) 19:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)