Talk:W
Add topic| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2019
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Kwiiri sam (talk) 13:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Granger (talk · contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Drollison30 (talk) 21:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
You messed up a wordddddddddddddddd
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 22:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2024f is the first thing that came to mind when we started using it as an extension for the app and I think that it is the
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Et the latest edition of this story from the Washington Center in New Hampshire is available for purchase on the website at the link in bio or on Facebook at the link to sign it up to receive a copy here at checkout code is available at no later in the book or on Facebook and you will be eligible for free access by email at checkout or by clicking here at email to subscribe to our page and get more details in our email archive Section at our blog or 2603:9000:8D02:A0EA:558F:AAC4:47C:5CBC (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)the one with all those little bits that make the world look better when it’s all together and the other with all those bits that are in it too but I think the one with all of the little bits is just as important as the other one that Z you can use it to make a big difference and I think it’s really nice that way and it’s a niceWmml thing for you guys because you guys have
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. '''[[User:CanonNi]]'''(talk|contribs) 01:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 May 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to change this page to include a three dimensional rendering of the capital and lower case serif depictions of the letter 'W'. The specific link I would like to include is this:

Thank you for your consideration. Jacob.niebergall (talk) 19:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done – It's generally understood that 3D models have relatively narrow encyclopedic value, unfortunately. This doesn't seem like it improves understanding of the topic for a general audience. Remsense诉 19:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree.
- Including an `.stl` 3D file of the letter "W" on the Wikipedia page for "W" enhances the educational and interactive value of the article, aligning with Wikipedia's mission to provide comprehensive and accessible knowledge.
- Visual aids such as 3D models have been shown to improve spatial understanding and retention of information, as evidenced by studies in educational technology. Additionally, other Wikipedia articles, such as those on "Regular dodecahedron" and "Three-dimensional space," use 3D models offering interactive experiences that enrich the content.
- Including a 3D model of the letter "W" would similarly provide readers with a tactile and engaging way to explore the letter's form and structure, appealing to visual and kinesthetic learners alike. Jacob.niebergall (talk) 20:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's not clear how. Considering it seems like you used ChatGPT to generate this response, I would venture that it's not clear how to you either, unfortunately. Remsense诉 02:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to address an accusation like that.
- Regardless, I think it's valuable to include 3D models in articles to provide Wikipedians access to visual models.
- Easily accessible '.stl' files can be used in educational settings for 3-D printing and in the study of typography.
- As virtual and augmented reality capabilities continue to enter the hands of more and more customers the ability to access virtual models of fundamental linguistic and cultural symbols could prove useful to a general audience.
- I will reiterate that 3D models are currently included in the pages of other articles on Wikipedia. I also discovered their presence in the Wikipedia galleries of the letters A and B. (https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U%2B0041_Noto_Sans_20230107.stl and https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U%2B0042_Noto_Sans_20230107.stl)
- My hope is that these arguments, rather than their syntax or word choice, will express my genuine belief in the value of this addition.
- Thank you for your consideration. Jacob.niebergall (talk) 03:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Don't respond using ChatGPT, please. Remsense诉 03:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's not clear how. Considering it seems like you used ChatGPT to generate this response, I would venture that it's not clear how to you either, unfortunately. Remsense诉 02:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Closing again; please don't reopen requests unless there's anything new you want to say. I fail to see how a 3D model better illustrates the shape of the letter than the 2D images already present. Liu1126 (talk) 20:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies. I was forming a reply and preemptively reopened the request. Jacob.niebergall (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)