Talk:Vortex coronagraph
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by Sisima70 in topic Embarrassment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vortex coronagraph article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Embarrassment
[edit]This article says absolutely nothing about how vortex (or any other coronagraphs) work. Someone should delete it; it's an embarrassment. Verdana♥Bøld 23:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's explained in Optical vortex Sisima70 (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Don't Delete! Improve!
[edit]The article is not great, but better than nothing. One of the weaknesses is that the references are mostly behind paywalls. An exception is https://www.eso.org/sci/publications/messenger/archive/no.152-jun13/messenger-no152-8-13.pdf so I'll start reading that. PeterGrecian (talk)