Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Virginia Woolf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 21 days ago by Paox17 in topic Stream of consciousness

External Video

[edit]

The link to the BBC website and a video of Woolf is effectively dead for many of us since it requires Flash. This should be removed or a warning placed on the page caption.

Note

[edit]

It is necessary to add the word "antisemite" in the section "Attitudes toward Judaism, Christianity and fascism". The examples are already there, but someone shies away from the crucial word which describes her attitude (my guess is that has been censored/forbidden by Woolf's feminist fanboys/fangirls)

Sexual abuse

[edit]

Hi all, I've removed the "Sexual abuse" paragraph from the article due to concerns about its compliance with Wikipedia's BLP policy and content guidelines for sensitive or controversial material, even though Virginia Woolf is a historical figure. The section contained serious allegations (including childhood sexual abuse and suggestions of sexual impropriety) that were presented in speculative language ("There is speculation" "There are also suggestions") without clear attributions to high quality, realiable secondary sources. Wikipedia policy requires that such claims be supported by strong sources, and framed with appropriate neutrality. I believe this removal is necessary to maintain neutrality of this article. Thanks! Mala1027 (talk) 02:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC) Mala1027Reply

Hi Mala1027, BLP applies to living people - given that all those involved are now long deceased, what is the BLP concern? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes this removal does not seem to make sense to me. Maybe it does not need it's own section but it certainly shouldn't all be removed.★Trekker (talk) 02:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
The section was clearly attributed to a work by Hermione Lee; what are your concerns about its quality and reliability? Ligaturama (talk) 08:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
I am also surprised with this removal, for the purported reasons. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you all for your input. I wanted to clarify that my removal of this section was not based on BLP alone, but on broader Wikipedia policies regarding verifiability and undue weight. While Woolf is not a living person, I felt the way the information was presented was vague and speculative (e.g., "there are suggestions"). This speculation could skew the neutrality of the article. I'm absolutely open to restoring the content if well-sourced material can be found and written with appropriate attribution and an encyclopedic tone. Thanks again. Mala1027 (talk) 23:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
What was wrong with the sources used?★Trekker (talk) 23:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

How many siblings?

[edit]

The article is confusing about VW's siblings and half-siblings. In para 2 we are told she was a seventh child of a couple and grew up in a 'blended family' (whatever that means) of eight - so there is one unaccounted for. Died? Left home? Then in the second para of section 'Life' we are told each of her parents had children from previous relationships, and she was in fact one of four full siblings, with four older half-siblings. I think this means she was the third child of her two parents together, and the seventh counting all the half-siblings; I still don't see who constitutes the family of eight - are her parents not included? It may not be all that important to her career, but if these details are to be included they should be accurate and straightforward. Newburyjohn (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Stream of consciousness

[edit]

The second sentence of this article states that Woolf uses stream of consciousness.

Yet, this is a contentious term in the scholarship (due to being so vague) and the sources that are meant to substantiate this claim (Taunton) don't use this term.

The literary technique more frequently associated with Woolf in scholarship on her is free indirect discourse.

Before I make the change (with supporting evidence) does anyone else have a view on this? Paox17 (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply