Talk:Virality (EP)

Virality (EP) was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 18, 2026, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA review

Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Unsuccessful. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 07:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Virality (EP)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gdshordy (talk · contribs) 21:03, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Camilasdandelions (talk · contribs) 07:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Gdshordy. Unfortunately, I decided to quickfail this article, as it still needs significant problems that should be addressed.

Various MOS violations; the |date= and |access-date= in references are not recommended format (YYYY-MM-DD), you should use {{Use American English}} template for this (See MOS:NUM). Also there're some words unnecessarily capitalized (UPROXX, VIRALITY, TIDAL etc.), and they should be addressed per MOS:ALLCAPS. MOS:CURLY is also found in this article. Additionally, you'd better see MOS:LEADCITE for citations in lead, which are unnecessary at all.
The article is kinda short, as you see it is only supported by two sections. You'd better seperate, and expand them.
Awkward sentences, such as "On one of the lead singles".
Reliability: DJBooth, Our Generation Music, Kazi Magazine - are they reliable at all?

Overall, the article needs more development to be GA status. Please re-nominate this article after you addressed these problems, and also I recommend you to refer other GA or FA articles for its more better quality. Good luck.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

GA review