Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Violin plot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Limit-theorem in topic Mirrored Density plot

Example plots need more explanation

[edit]

The top one should explain what the positions/length/ends of the two lines in each plot represent; and the lower one should explain what the white region inside each coloured plot represents (is it another narrower violin plot ?). - Rod57 (talk) 17:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Comprehensibility

[edit]

This is about the worst explanation I have ever read. It describes the violin plot using technical terms that no one would understand unless they were so educated that they should already know what a violin plot was.

Explanations should FIRST be understandable by high school graduates, then (if necessary) a more accurate explanation should be given.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:704B:900:E1B5:6003:404:7A98 (talk) 13:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

In the external links, The Examples of a violin plot in R is a dead link.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.112.93.54 (talk) 14:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Removing it.Limit-theorem (talk) 07:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

too much redundancy

[edit]

As far as I can see: the second, third and fourth paragraphs are 3 independent attempts at explanation. To me, they simply clutter the article. A lot of redundancy can be removed there, and I will probably attempt it over the next couple of days. Adpete (talk) 05:40, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mirrored Density plot

[edit]

This looks more like a shamless-plug than an actual interesting information. There are constantly countless of papers published on improvements of current methods in every possible field. The current paper this is linking to has only 23 citation according to Google-Scholar. Far from being wide accepted method. I think this part should be removed.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A10:8005:3277:0:FD31:C100:9602:AEEB (talk) 08:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Will remove and ask for more established papers. This is an encyclopedia synthetizing the current state of knowledge, not a repository of the latest research. Limit-theorem (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply