Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Vijayanagara Empire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Vanamonde93 in topic Synthesis tag
Former featured articleVijayanagara Empire is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 8, 2012.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 11, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 31, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
December 24, 2021Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

New map

[edit]

I have put a new map in place of older one, the new one also shows its influence (Tributaries in Burma pegu) By source

Nilakanta Sastri, K. A. (1955) [reissued 2002]. A History of South India: From Prehistoric Times to the Fall of Vijayanagar. New Delhi: Indian Branch, Oxford University SharmaPutra (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Rawn3012 SharmaPutra (talk) 06:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I appreciate your efforts to improve the map of Vijayanagara and to provide viewers with the nearest greatest extent of the polity. However, I believe it may not be the best representation. Here are several issues with your map:
1. The inclusion of coastal areas is disputed, as the rival Bahmani Sultanate frequently attempted to control the region, leading to changes in sovereignty over a short period. Hence, It would not be a good idea to include it.
2. The inclusion of Sri Lanka has also been contested by some editors in the past, and the consensus was to remove it from the map. See the talk page archive
3. Graphically, the map is not as appealing as the current version. Aside from Vijayanagara, many areas appear blank.
Also, you need WP:CONSENSUS for adding your map to the article as this is a disputed subject and the current version has only been obtained through consensus.
Regards Rawn3012 (talk) 07:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Rawn3012
Okay! But
This below map is same as the current one, but in better graphics. SharmaPutra (talk) 12:57, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
SharmaPutra (talk) 12:57, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Indian empire of Vijaynagar map.svg SharmaPutra (talk) 12:59, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
SharmaPutra is another sock, move along. Girth Summit (blether) 14:34, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Okay Rawn3012 (talk) 08:37, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Spelling mistakes for Bahmani Sultanate

[edit]

There are five instances where Bahmani Sultanate is misspelled as "Bahamani" Sultanate. I would fix it, but it's currently semi-protected so I can't TheNamesJonas (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Could you tell us where each typo is so we can correct it? AlvaKedak (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Done AlvaKedak (talk) 11:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Yadava" is linked to wrong Page

[edit]

Hello, in introduction Yadava is linked to wrong page - It should be linked to (Yadu_(legendary_king)) of Chandravamsha lineage. 117.215.175.184 (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done request is unclear. In the introduction paragraph, Yadava refers to the Yadava clan, who were an ancient Indian people who believed to have descended from Yadu. AlvaKedak (talk) 16:17, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

A question of the style

[edit]

In the Architecture section's 3rd paragraph, it says "The Vijayanagara temples of Kolar, Kanakagiri, Sringeri and other towns of Karnataka; the temples of Tadpatri, Lepakshi, Ahobilam, Tirumala Venkateswara Temple and Srikalahasti in Andhra Pradesh; and the temples of Vellore, Kumbakonam, Kanchi and Srirangam in Tamil Nadu are examples of this style." Here, the style being talked about is monoliths, implying the temples to be monolithic. However, that is not true, For example, the Kolar temple has monolithic features but in itself is not a monolith. Therefore, there should be an edit made to remove this misunderstanding. Mjg.is.da.best (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Synthesis tag

[edit]

The second sentence of the lead paragraph combines statements of uncontroversial fact with the claim that the brothers were members of a lineage we describe as legendary. I have tagged this for the moment, but absent a fix it will need removal. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:08, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Vanamonde93: This was originally added by a caste warrior sock network and I'll be removing it, we have none the need to feature this cruft. Been long enough. Gotitbro (talk) 03:34, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I agree. Thanks. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:17, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply