Talk:Vidoop
Add topic | This page was proposed for deletion by Steven Walling (talk · contribs) on 26 February 2010 with the comment: Vidoop has entered the dead pool and shows no signs of resurrection. See this and other reports. It was contested by Cnilep (talk · contribs) on 27 February 2010 with the comment: Notability is not temporary. If the company was notable when it was in operation, it is notable. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Created page
[edit]Due to a possible conflict of interest, I will not edit this page again or object to its deletion or modification. However, I felt that the level of notability is easily high enough to warrent inclusion in Wikipedia, with over a hundred thousand Google results. --Duplico 20:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Marketing
[edit]For an information page, this seems ok. I do have concerns with stating a founder announced a fortune 500 company will be using it. That seems like pure marketing to me. In addition naming who the current advertisers are seems like extra advertising. Is this something that should be on wikipedia? 70.189.99.40 19:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)reiger
Criticisms
[edit]That phishing attack video is pretty stupid. It can be applied to any website. It's no different from a PayPal scam where a user gets a fake email, clicks on a link (that doesn't even go to PayPal) and enters their information. I don't think it deserves to be here. 24.199.71.191 10:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
The input scraping problem is a little bit silly as presented. When your computer has input logging software installed on it, it ceases to be your computer.209.22.88.90 (talk) 14:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)