Talk:Vibank

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Canada: Saskatchewan / Communities / Saskatchewan communities Mid‑importance

	Canada portal Canada notice board This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan communities.

Protection status?

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It appears this page is being edited simply for the purposes of harassing a specific individual or individuals. After searching around, the culprit appears to be part of a group calling themselves the 'Capitalist Army', listeners of a show called "True Capitalist Radio" on Blogtalkradio. The host of the show, who goes by the handles Ghost or ghostpolitics, encouraged a 'wikibomb' of the page by retweeting a message from one of his listeners to do so. https://twitter.com/#!/giorgioisright/status/178620171181752321

Wikipedia certainly isn't here to aid in some vendetta, so I think we should at least get a semi-protected status for this page until this calms down. ... (talk) 02:48, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

If it becomes problematic, we can certainly protect the article, but there's no reason to do so right now. Mind matrix 14:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Protection status?