Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Vere Chappell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by UtherSRG in topic Refs from AFD

Not COI

[edit]

Not an autobiography; I have a similar name but I am not the subject of this article. I am related to the subject, but the article is entirely neutral. The subject is definitely notable, cited in several other Wiki articles. I have added a third-party reference and will look for more. Vchappell (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

While the subject may be notable, there do not seem to be enough sources on which to base a biographical article, so the article looks like a resume or curriculum vitae, which is not encyclopedic. Yworo (talk) 06:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Remove Notability Flag?

[edit]

According to Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines[1], "The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1" and "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable."

The book, Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell[2] is a festschrift published in honor of Vere Chappell.

Although the word "festschrift" does not appear in the publisher's description of the book, it is referred to as such elsewhere (for example: Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21[3] states: "Chapter 3, "Cause, Object, and Self" written in 2004 for a festschrift for Vere Chappell..."

Given that "the publication of a festschrift is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1," would it be appropriate to remove the notability flag?

ALSO: Would Criterion 3 ("The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association...or a fellow of a major scholarly society") be met because he was a Fulbright fellow, National Endowment for Humanities fellow, and member of the American Philosophical Association, Aristotelian Society, and Royal Institute Philosophy?[4]

Thank you for your consideration. I am a Wikipedia novice and the subject's son, so I would appreciate any assistance from more experienced Wikipedians. Vchappell (talk) 06:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)
  2. Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell
  3. Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume by Paul Guyer, page 21
  4. https://prabook.com/web/vere_claiborne.chappell/147668

Refs from AFD

[edit]

Good keep. @Jahaza: are you planning to update the article with the sources you listed? - UtherSRG (talk) 11:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply