Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Varne Bank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 88.219.191.86 in topic Weblinks

Depth

[edit]

How deep is the Varne Bank? Shallow according to this: http://www.blipfoto.com/entry/2262155  Preceding unsigned comment added by Varnebank (talkcontribs) 22:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

On one nautical chart the shallowest point is entered as "4". But I don't know if this is metres, or feet or fathoms or whatever. The main shipping routes seem to be between "20" and "55" deep in this area. --BjKa (talk) 10:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


Coordinates

[edit]

When I found the page, it said no more than <!-- BAD coordinates {{coord|51|1|286|N|1|23|879|E|display=title}} -->
So I used this map in conjunction with the satellite view of Google Maps to come up with the coordinates of 51°0′0″N 1°22′30″E.
NB: According to the nautical chart the "Varne" lightship is not sitting on the sandbank, but slightly northeast of it.
--BjKa (talk) 10:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Many of the links quoted as sources have gone dead in the meantime. --BjKa (talk) 10:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Broken links:
88.219.191.86 (talk) 11:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Varne Bank/CommentsTalk:Varne Bank/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Assessed as start class due to good referencing and linking. To achieve B class:-
  • It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. = yes
  • It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. = ?? (it appears to cover a good range, but this is outside my area of knowledge)
  • It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. = no
  • It is free from major grammatical errors. = yes
  • It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. = no
Comment:- Article could be expanded and needs to be put into sections. Photographs are needed (Varne Lightship?) Mjroots (talk) 10:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 10:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)