Talk:Unlimited Intimacy
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Crisco 1492 in topic Did you know nomination
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Unlimited Intimacy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 June 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
( )
- ... that queer theory professor Tim Dean's book Unlimited Intimacy investigates the sexual subculture of barebacking among gay men?
- Source: (Literally any of them, really, but let's go with) Reviewed Work: Unlimited Intimacy: Reflections on the Subculture of Barebacking Tim Dean - Cultural Critique
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sulyoadikusumo
- Comment: If you have any ALT hook suggestions that you think would work better, I'm all ears. I couldn't think of one other than a straightforward one like the above, since the subject matter itself is inherently interesting.
SilverserenC 00:47, 1 May 2026 (UTC).
Great article. Article is new/long enough, fully cited, neutral, well written in an encyclopedic style, stable, and has no AISIGNS or copyright violations (Earwig pulls 6.5% but it is mostly incidental, although many sources are offline and accepted in good faith). Hook is interesting and cited. My concern is with uncited claims found in the lead. Everything in the lead should be cited and mentioned elsewhere in the body per MOS:LEADCITE. But several things are not: queer theory, the University of Chicago Press , and the June 15, 2009 claim. Other than that, we are good. Please ping me when this is taken care of and I'll take another look. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 03:05, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
- I've added a source, Morogris. Wasn't sure if I would have to just use a primary source for info like that, but I actually found a journal article with the exact info for the three things you brought up. SilverserenC 03:15, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
@Silver seren: Awesome, thank you, review is done. Feel free to incorporate the info/ref to the body paragraphs if you want that way you can remove the ref from the lead (I like the lead without refs because they look "cleaner" to me and they often have more flexibility to cover more stuff in a broader way. Up to you. ALT0 is ready for the main page. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 03:31, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Book articles
- Reference works task force articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class AIDS articles
- Low-importance AIDS articles
- WikiProject AIDS articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class United States History articles
- Low-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles


