Talk:Universal grinder

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.

Philosophy: Logic / Analytic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Analytic philosophy

Unappealing

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I suspect that this was an opinion inserted by the editor who wrote it, and not an essential idea about the "universal grinder" phenomenon:

sentences made using the "universal grinder" can sometimes appear unappealing

Pelltier makes no such claim. In fact, some of his examples (mashed potato, [ground] steak) seem downright appealing to me. Of course, that's just my opinion. More importantly, I can find no one asserting that the "universal grinder" produces "unappealing" sentences. Or more precisely, I can find this exact sentence on the web, but those cases were almost certainly copied from Wikipedia. I cannot find this idea in books or scholarly articles. Cnilep (talk) 04:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Emmon Bach

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If memory serves, I think Emmon Bach was the first to use "universal packager", but I can't seem to find a reliable source to verify this.

Bach, Emmon (February 1986). "The Algebra of Events". Linguistics and Philosophy. 9 (1).

Cnilep (talk) 05:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Unappealing

Emmon Bach