Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Uniform Civil Code/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Simongraham in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 10:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

This article is a quick fail. The article has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. Specifically, the lead:

  • Contains {{citation needed}} tags;
  • Contains a number of other statements without citations to reputable sources.

An example is the entire paragraph "This draft also creates hopes for the LGBTQIA+ community in India as it does not differentiate between individuals based on their sex, gender, or sexual orientation. Same-sex marriages are not recognised legally by any applicable law in India till now." There is no citation to a reputable source.

MOS:LEAD has some excellent guidance on how to construct a lead. Particularly, the lead should be a summary of the article. This means that often the lead does not have any citations as everything is already cited and referenced int the body. I feel a rewrite of the lead and additional information in the body to support the statements in the lead is necessary before the article is submitted to a full review. However, I also feel that the article would merit being a Good Article and would encourage a resubmission once the submitter has completed the necessary work. simongraham (talk) 10:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply