Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:USS YMS-107

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Luis Santos24 in topic The article

Untitled

[edit]

3 of the top results retrieved for the query 34669 selected:

descriptions-only

=========================== Result 1 ===========================
[edit]

Title: [Case Number 34669] Collision between the USS YMS-107 and the US

         Army FS-369, October 1945-July 1946 (Folder 2 of 2)

National Archives Identifier: 4687259 Title: [Case Number 34669] Collision between the USS YMS-107 and the US

         Army FS-369, October 1945-July 1946 (Folder 2 of 2)

HMS Entry Number: P 2 Snippet: 4492688 ... ... File ... File ... 125 ... P 2 ... Textual Records

         ... P 2 ... Preservation-Reproduction-Reference ... Archives II 
         Reference Section (Military), Textual Archives Services Division

URL: http://research.archives.gov/description/4687259

=========================== Result 2 ===========================
[edit]

Title: [Case Number 34669] Collision between the USS YMS-107 and the US

         Army FS-369, October 1945-July 1946 (Folder 1 of 2)

National Archives Identifier: 4687258 Title: [Case Number 34669] Collision between the USS YMS-107 and the US

         Army FS-369, October 1945-July 1946 (Folder 1 of 2)

HMS Entry Number: P 2 Snippet: 4492688 ... ... File ... File ... 125 ... P 2 ... Textual Records

         ... P 2 ... Preservation-Reproduction-Reference ... Archives II 
         Reference Section (Military), Textual Archives Services Division

URL: http://research.archives.gov/description/4687258

=========================== Result 3 ===========================
[edit]

Title: [Case Number 34669] Collision between the USS YMS-107 and the US

         Army FS-369, October 1945-July 1946 (Folder 2 of 2)

National Archives Identifier: 4687260 Title: [Case Number 34669] Collision between the USS YMS-107 and the US

         Army FS-369, October 1945-July 1946 (Folder 2 of 2)

HMS Entry Number: P 2 Snippet: 4492688 ... ... File ... File ... 125 ... P 2 ... Textual Records

         ... P 2 ... Preservation-Reproduction-Reference ... Archives II 
         Reference Section (Military), Textual Archives Services Division

URL: http://research.archives.gov/description/4687260 ______________________________________________________________________________

http://research.archives.gov/description/4687258 http://research.archives.gov/description/4687259 http://research.archives.gov/description/4687260

______________________________________________________________________________

http://uboat.net/allies/warships/ship/9527.html

__________________________________________________

http://www.navsource.org/archives/11/19107.htm

_________________________________________________________ ~baudeagle 3/21/13 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baudeagle (talkcontribs) 18:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

________________________________________________ Information about the FS-369

T-AKL-27 ex US Army FS-369

  • Steel Hull, Gross Tons 560
  • Built by Sturgeon Bay Shipbuilding, Sturgeon Bay, WI.
  • Delivered to the US Army 1944
  • Transferred from USAT to MSTS, 1 July 1950
  • Struck from the Naval Register in 1966

Used for salvage training _______________________________________________ Baudeagle (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC) baudeagle 3/21/13Reply

The article

[edit]

Very little is known about YMS-107 Baudeagle, mainly because auxilaries were built in such grand numbers in such little time, the majority of them, such as this one, didn't even have a name, and served a couple of years before either being scrapped or sold to a developing country in the sixties,however, i tried to add as much info as i could about YMS-107, even adding a pic, and will in any way i can.

Yours Truly, --Luis Santos24 (talk) 01:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC) :-)Reply