Talk:Turquoise (color)
Add topic| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
wavelength
[edit]Pearl Mystic Turqoise
[edit]Is there proof or a source for the color Pearl Mystic Turquoise?Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 18:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Link to Turkish page
[edit]When I look at the corresponding pages in other languages, for Turkish, the Mineral https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkuaz is linked, despite in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5960345#sitelinks-wikipedia it says https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkuaz_(renk) I have no idea how to fix it. --W.pseudon (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
"Reform party turquoise"
[edit]@Sahaib3005: You have tried to include a section on "Reform party Turquoise" in this article twice, first on the basis of a source which didn't mention there being a "Reform party turquoise" and secondly on the basis of a Facebook post by the Reform party. I hope you understand if others make the inference that you don't have a suitable reliable source to suggest that this particular shade is known in English as "Reform party turquoise". It seems clear that you are trying to make a promotional edit that has not much to do with the subject of this article. Please don't reinstate the section unless you have provided suitable reliable sources. If you continue, we'll have to seek dispute resolution. MartinPoulter (talk) 21:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
@MartinPoulter:, I promise I won’t add it again, I was mostly annoyed because I’d spent hours adding it. Also I don’t support the Reform Party.Sahaib3005 (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
"Reform UK turquoise" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Reform UK turquoise and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 13 § Reform UK turquoise until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
About CMYK values of the Turquoise color.
[edit]There were no CMYK values of the Turquoise in this page. - Harry Cousins (talk) 23:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC).
But there are pages with the Turquoise CMYK values.[1]. [2][3]
Cyan value of Turquoise is between 59.5 to 76.0, Magenta values is between 0.0 to 8, the Yellow values is between 6.0 to 8.0 and Black Key value is between 16.5 to 36.0 .
Harry Cousins (talk) 23:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC) Harry Cousins (talk) 23:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
About the description of the colour in Hindi/Urdu language
[edit]The word for the colour Turquoise has been described in the Rekhta Dictionary for Urdu/Hindi word as "Firozi":
Fiirozii
"फ़ीरोज़ी فِیروزی"
[edit]Noun, Feminine
- a coin of Firoz Shah Tughlaq's time of India
- victory, success, good fortune, prosperity
Adjective
I was thinking of adding this word with this context to the title paragraph thus making it easier for people searching for Firozi in search engines to find this colour article. Is this a good addition? Krishnampkumawat (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Contradiction
[edit]Doesn't the opening paragraph contradict itself about the age of the word? It claims "The word turquoise dates to the 17th century", and then in the following sentence that "The first recorded use of turquoise as a color name in English was in 1573", which of course was before the 17th century. 155.4.130.25 (talk) 17:49, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
"On the right"
[edit]"The X11 color named turquoise is displayed on the right.", this direction is untrue on i.e. mobile browsers. I'm not up to whatever standards exist for this sort of thing but it is incorrect as a blanket direction. ~2026-21403-17 (talk) 23:17, 7 June 2026 (UTC)