Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Turned m

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Largoplazo in topic Letter of the Latin alphabet?

Untitled

[edit]

I removed the bold from ɯ and Ɯ, because they do not render properly in some browsers. --horsedreamer 20:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Letter of the Latin alphabet?

[edit]

"Ɯ (minuscule: ɯ) is a letter of the Latin alphabet, ...." No it isn't. It may originate as a funny way of writing "W" for purposes of expanding the character set available for purposes like IPA, but it isn't itself a distinct letter of the Latin alphabet. Largoplazo (talk) 21:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

No, you're wrong. It certainly is not part of the alphabet of the Latin language, but it is a letter of the extended Latin script, much like Þ (and like W originally). Just because it is no longer in active use in a current Latin-script orthography nor has it been used as part of the orthography of a language relatively known in the Western world (the way Þ is used in current Icelandic orthography and was used historically in Old English), does not make it any less valid as a Latin-script letter. And no, it is not just an IPA character nor “a funny way of writing W”; it is a full-fledged Latin-script letter, with its own distinct identity and its own lowercase and uppercase forms and its own Unicode points, that was used and considered a perfectly normal letter in the Latin-script alphabet of the Zhuang language for decades. 92.178.80.48 (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
You're conflating "letter added to an alphabet that was mostly the Latin alphabet" with "part of the Latin alphabet". Largoplazo (talk) 23:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Having just published that remark, it occurred to me that maybe one could say the same about J and W. Hmmm. Largoplazo (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply