Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Trite parvula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by AxonsArachnida in topic Merge into Maratus griseus?

Merge into Maratus griseus?

[edit]

I'm wondering if this article should be merged into Maratus griseus.

In 2019 Trite parvula (aka Euophrys parvula) was apparently renamed Hypoblemum griseum by Otto, Hill & Whyte.[1] This was done somewhat obtusely to my mind, but I'm not a biologist, and I find the paper hard to follow (read it for yourself). The key sentence was, "Żabka & Pollard (2002a) listed Euophrys parvula Bryant 1835 [1935] as a synonym, although they also placed this unrelated species in a different genus, Trite Simon 1885, in a separate paper (Żabka & Pollard 2002b)." They go on to say, "Forster & Forster (1972), followed by Jackson & Willey (1995), had mistakenly identified Hypoblemum griseum as Euophrys parvula." Seems like a comedy of errors, what with Z&P writing '1835' when they meant '1935'. Regardless, the name change was confirmed by arachnologist Fiona Cross in a popular science post later in 2019.[2]

Then in 2021 Otto & Hill moved Hypoblemum griseum to Maratus, it becoming Maratus griseus.[3]

However, the World Spider Catalog still lists T. parvula/E. parvula as an accepted species.[4] And, it has no mention of parvula under Maratus griseus.[5]

iNaturalist has no observations for Trite parvula but thousands of NZ observations for Maratus griseus.

Anyone able to figure this all out? Nurg (talk) 01:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at this in a few days (a bit busy right now), but it has me interested. AxonsArachnida (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I now think I was misled by the Cross article and thus misinterpreted Otto, Hill & Whyte. I think they were saying that parvula was unrelated to Hypoblemum griseum, and that Forster & Forster (1972), followed by Jackson & Willey (1995), had been looking at Hypoblemum griseum specimens and mistakenly thinking they were parvula. So I presume Cross was following the mistake of the Forsters, and Jackson & Willey. Perhaps Cross had not read Otto, Hill & Whyte, which was published only about 6 months earlier. So, scrap the idea of a merger. Cc User:AxonsArachnida. Nurg (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Looks like you beat me to it. I contacted someone who is researcher Trite and they mentioned that there's a history of the two species being mixed up, even though they are clearly different. AxonsArachnida (talk) 01:52, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Otto, Jürgen C.; Hill, David E.; Whyte, Robert (12 March 2019). "Australian jumping spiders of the genus Hypoblemum (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryini)" (PDF). Peckhamia (180.1): 4.
  2. Cross, Fiona (5 October 2019). "A celebration of spiders". UC Science. University of Canterbury. Retrieved 23 April 2026.
  3. Otto, Jürgen C.; Hill, David. E. (24 February 2021). "Catalogue of the Australian peacock spiders (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryini: Maratus), version 4" (PDF). Peckhamia (148.4): 1, 22.
  4. "Trite parvula (Bryant, 1935)". World Spider Catalog.
  5. "Maratus griseus (Keyserling, 1882)". World Spider Catalog.