Talk:Tripartisme
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
[edit]What is the basis for calling this either "The Three-parties alliance" or "Three-parties", both of which strike me as very odd English? - Jmabel | Talk 22:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I've never heard this called the Three-parties system in English, it's always called the Tripartite alliance or Tripartite system. (I don't know how to edit titles of pages, or if this will cause problems) (talk) 13:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Problems with the article...
[edit]1. I assume it has been written by a non-native English speaker (probably French), as there are some rather odd turns of phrase.
2. More seriously, no citations/references whatsoever.
Suggested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved as suggested. Sandstein 16:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Three-parties → Tripartisme – "Three-parties", with the hyphen, is an adjective in English, while without the hyphen its just a generic phrase. Srnec (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Support This seems to be a forced, artificial translation. I notice other editors opposed to the title in the first section on the page. A quick search for "three parties" -wikipedia suggests no one else is using this term (or at least that it's ambiguous). --BDD (talk) 18:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.