Talk:Trevor Loudon

Create an article for Keywiki?

Should we create an article for keywiki.org to help explain what it's used for? — Preceding unsigned comment added by This-is-name (talk • contribs) 02:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

I wonder if it yet meets WP:Notability standards. I've found many sources that link to its articles but not any sources that examine it. Timtastic (talk) 23:40, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Unlikely. Nobody takes it seriously and it's largely just a clearinghouse of names based on Loudon's trolling of Facebook event invites and other public content. There's no editorial standards and most of the prose where it exists is just copy-and-pasted from the source material. But if it's reported on and taken seriously by third-party press, then it might meet notability, but no sense in putting the cart before the horse here. JesseRafe (talk) 17:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Comment

Referring to Trevor Loudon as a "far right conspiracy theorist" is an obvious politically motivated smear. The sources used are clearly biased and only cite one another, and not one of Trevor Loudon's points of fact in his massive body of work is disputed. Wikipedia should only use subjective labels like that if they are backed by evidence.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.234.53.178 (talk • contribs)

We go by what the reliable sources say. Loudon's own writings are not a suitable source, other than to show his opinions.-gadfium 19:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

SPLC, Media Matters and Rolling Stone are left wing. They are biased sources. 2601:644:881:2990:9020:8746:A337:BC2 (talk) 04:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Reality_has_a_well_known_liberal_biasReality_has_a_well_known_liberal_bias Do we have list of wikis page that might sort the wikis by monthly average user, or similar, or page count, or number of edits?

Mathiastck (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)