Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Tory Lane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sangdeboeuf in topic Real name

Additional photos

[edit]

There are an additional two free-licensed photographs of this actress at Image:Tory Lane, LA party 1.JPG and Image:Tory Lane, LA party 2.JPG. If any feel they'd serve as a main image better than the current choice, feel free to replace. They're just there in case of a sudden expansion of the article. GeeJo (t)(c)  14:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

IAFD

[edit]

@Guy1890, re: , Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography#Reliable_for_filmographies.2C_not_biographies lists IAFD as unreliable for biographic data czar 04:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't actually say that at all. What it does say is that IAFD "Sometimes has a better biography, usually has a better film list. ... Their filmographies are considered reliable, but opinion is split on whether their biographical information is reliable." IAFD has been used in Wikipedia articles like this one countless numbers of times for basic biographic data and reliable adult filmography information. Guy1890 (talk) 07:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
"Their filmographies are considered reliable, but opinion is split on whether their biographical information is reliable." If there is consensus that the site is reliable for biographic data (fact-checking process, reputation for editorial quality, etc.), then it's time to change that sentence. If there is no consensus, then it is not a reliable source. czar 14:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Real name

[edit]

Couldn't add "Lisa Nicole Piasecki" as her real name. Sources here, here, and more here.

When trying to publish, I get: "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, so it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error. Disruptive behavior may result in being blocked from editing." Not sure if this has to do with anonymous editing, or if there's a policy against adding real names to porn star bios. I looked at the Wikipedia pages for Belladonna (actress) and Jenna Jameson as examples. 2607:9880:1980:1B0:B204:4631:EF40:6758 (talk) 23:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please review WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLPNAME. The sources you provided are not collectively adequate to support inclusion of the name. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. WP:ONEEVENT covered by two reliable news outlets plus WP:DAILYMAIL & assorted blogs do not amount to wide coverage of the subject's legal name IMO. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:59, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply