Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Toplyga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 22 days ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 25 August 2026

TV Coverage

[edit]

Is there any tv companies that cover the A Lyga?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.240.89.39 (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2007

Spectator data

[edit]

@Sir Sputnik: Spectator data is pretty accurate, if you have other sources please correct and update, don't just negate other users work with some blunt generalization that one particular source is not reliable.Wolfmartyn (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Wolfmartyn: Since much of transfermarkt's content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is a self-published and therefore unreliable source. It should not be cited. As such, the attendence figures are unverified, and should not be readded without including a reliable source. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Sir Sputnik: Wikipedia is also user-edited and self-published, does this mean it is unreliable? Also, if you start black-listing certain sources that is a slippery slope of bringing in bias and profiling, just like you did now - first shoot/delete then question. Wolfmartyn (talk) 01:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia is also user-edited and self-published, does this mean it is unreliable? Yes: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Also, if you start black-listing certain sources that is a slippery slope Some sources are more reliable than others, it's a fundamental principle of Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. And per WP:FOOTY consensus (see Wikipedia:Consensus), Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Link to most recent Transfermarkt discussion: WP:TRANSFERMARKT. And we only include reliable sources, which means they have to demonstrate a level of fact-checking which Transfermarkt does not, because it's a user-generated site. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

"2026 A Lyga" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect 2026 A Lyga has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 19 § Football redirects until a consensus is reached. Alex (talk) 07:17, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 25 August 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply


TOPLYGAToplyga – In 2026, the league rebranded as TOPLYGA, which is not an acronym, but a stylization. MOS:ALLCAPS instructs us to "Avoid writing with all caps (all capital letters) ... when they have only a stylistic function." While some sources follow the all-caps stylizations, others do not, e.g. TOPlyga, Toplyga. (Admittedly, there are very few sources at all, especially in English.) pburka (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 09:31, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.