Talk:TopNotch
Add topicLatest comment: 12 years ago by Drmies in topic A7
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TopNotch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from TopNotch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 October 2013. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
A7
[edit]STATicVerseatide proposed this for speedy deletion as non-notable; my understanding is that a record label is deemed notable if it has a roster that includes some notable artists. I admit it's a circular process in terms of notability, but this outfit seems to have quite a number of notable artists. (I also admit it's a terrible article!) So perhaps AfD is the way to go--or article improvement. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 02:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- No big deal, but true it does have a few notable acts so A7 might not apply. There is just something about unreferenced articles that irk me, for all we know a majority of the notable artists might not even be signed to the label. STATic message me! 04:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- True dat. I put in a few quick references and will start pruning that list. I hate articles without text anyway--they look like marketing. Also, I had no idea that there were this many Dutch hip-hop acts; there's only one for me, and that's the Osdorp Posse, but I'm so old skool they don't make the parts anymore. BTW, the one act I referenced was South-African; I thought that was noteworthy. Drmies (talk) 04:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ha, almost at DYK length. Drmies (talk) 05:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)