Talk:Tom Apodaca

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: North Carolina / State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures.

Politics: American

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

"Environmental damage" section

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

---revised by n00b to fix some of the issues mentioned below. In addition, I deleted a couple of phrases that did not have citations where citations are needed. Specifically: "and has been ranked as one of the most effective members of the North Carolina General Assembly" By whom? Need to cite, especialy given current divisive views on the general assembly.

"Tom has been the recipient of several awards for his legislative work and is ranked as one of the most pro-business members of the General Assembly." Again, by whom? Need to cite.

---prior comment from me below.----

underoak (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)akrewsonReply

I'm new-ish to this, so bear with me.

I'd like to question this part: "In response to environmental damage by Duke Energy Inc, he will draft legislation in May 2014 that will require Duke Energy to clean up its coal ash ponds, including the one in Buncombe County."

This is unattributed to a reliable, authoritative source and describes an action in the future that might not happen or might be modified to such an extent that this description is inaccurate.

It would be better like this: "In response to environmental damage by Duke Energy Inc, he plans to draft legislation in May 2014 that will require Duke Energy to clean up its coal ash ponds, including the one in Buncombe County."

And it would be better for such a statement to indicate over what time period that cleanup would be supposed to happen according to the legislation. Here's a good place to get that info as a citation, and include the "five to 10 years" quote: ^[1]

In addition, this entry would be better if it included Apodaca's other votes on environmental issues, especially water quality issues, like in Senate Bill 229 from 2011: ^[2]

```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akrewson (talk • contribs) 16:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

References

[1] ttp://www.blueridgenow.com/article/20140212/ARTICLES/140219959

[2] ttp://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2011/Bills/Senate/HTML/S229v6.html

[1]

[2]

This page was redesigned at the edge.

"Environmental damage" section