Talk:TitanFile

Huh? This one is actually interesting, for once. Hallalougha!

While the site was to debated about being a piracy drop, it actually becomes of certain interest when it's not intended to be explicitly just for piracy. It's an okay article. I think more research should oughta be done, write more about the company and the service. As it is, it needs work, but could be the start of actual relevance, and importance. I don't see it myself, but it's nice to think actual services could be subjectively, and factually talked about, instead of promoting piracy services. That's all, man. Wikipedia is going to go under, having this horse manure, and it might actually happen if the government gets ahold of all of this. Just saying. Food for thought. 2001:558:6032:0:2C31:FE94:7DC2:DACB (talk) 08:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Cleanup Notice

It looks like the article has been greatly cleaned up with proper references added. I propose removing the notice. 70.28.59.85 (talk) 01:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because... --Mvrekic (talk) 15:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC) It is an established company with external references and recognized significance. I will follow up with additional information and references.

Removing Unnecessary Marketing Language

"TitanFile is a professional online file sharing and collaboration service." The term "professional" here lends no clear semantic improvement, and no elaboration on why it is specifically a "professional... service". I have removed this word, as I feel it detracts from the piece's objectivity. Tohuw (talk) 03:42, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Additionally, I am uncomfortable with "The company is one of the secure cloud computing pioneers advocating for stronger privacy policies in Canada as well as USA." Beyond the lack of citation, I propose the sentence be reworded as "In addition to this service, TitanFile advocates for stronger consumer privacy policies in Canada and the United States." Tohuw (talk) 03:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)