Talk:TimescaleDB
Add topic | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
sources
[edit]There are independent and reliable sources to add within the article text. From Google Books:
- Zabbix 5 IT Infrastructure Monitoring Cookbook, Nathan Liefting, Brian van Baekel · 2021
- Developing Modern Database Applications with PostgreSQL, Dr. Quan Ha Le, Marcelo Diaz · 2021
- Mastering Apache Pulsar, Jowanza Joseph · 2021
- Practical Time Series Analysis, Aileen Nielsen · 2019
- Learning PostgreSQL 11: A Beginner's Guide to Building High-performance PostgreSQL Database Solutions, 3rd Edition, Salahaldin Juba, Andrey Volkov · 2019
- Learn Algorithmic Trading: Build and Deploy Algorithmic Trading Systems and Strategies Using Python and Advanced Data Analysis, Sebastien Donadio, Sourav Ghosh · 2019
bear with me as I add citations (or feel free to help out here.) riffic (talk) 00:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Assertion of notability
[edit]The assertion of notability is in the reference titled "Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Volume 8 - Data Visualization", which calls the tool indispensable for building metric-driven workflows. riffic (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I strongly second this. TimescaleDB is at least as notable as many of the other time series databases listed here. — Guillaume Pelletier ~ 03:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Waiting for review
[edit]Sorry, I'm not going to wait for review. I feel with the sources listed this asserts its notability. Please don't template my talk page. riffic (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]Hi, I added independent sources to show notability some time ago. I don't think this should be speedy deleted, and would be happy to argue that it meets inclusion criteria set at WP:NSOFT. Please use AfD instead. riffic (talk) 18:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)