Talk:Timekeeper

This article was nominated for deletion on January 2, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 15:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article survived an AfD. The discussion can be found here. enochlau (talk) 23:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

So what is Timekeeper anyway, isn't same as scorekeeper. 22:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)