Talk:Tickle Cock Bridge/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Interestingly, I watched the "Kevin McCloud and the Big Town Plan" broadcasts and I don't particularly "remember" the "old structure (without its roof)" in your first photograph. The second picture is a bit more familiar; but the one I do remember is the one "with the roof one" shown in ref 1. I think you aught to retitle that first picture to make it clear that the roof has gone; and, even better, show a picture with the roof on (if there is one to hand).

Other than that, there is not much more I can say. You have a GA, congratulations on acheiving the standard. Pyrotec (talk) 19:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)