Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Threewalls

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Lowkeysesame in topic Peer Review

Peer Review Note

[edit]

Hello! I was really impressed with the start of your wikipedia page. The draft definitely has lots of potential and I can't wait to see the end product. I really liked how concise it is, and gets to the point fairly quickly. Something I will say, though, is to be aware of grammatical issues since there seems to be quite a few grammatical issues. Also, I do recommend adding more information into the sections, since some sections are quite small and could do with some more information. Wizzi7 (talk) 03:54, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review Note

[edit]

Hi! I really enjoyed reading your group's Wikipedia draft, you chose such an interesting organization, and I’m glad I got to learn about it. I thought the article had a lot of great information that highlighted important aspects of Threewalls, and it was well formatted and sourced. I noted some grammatical and other errors in my review, but I can’t wait to see the final article. Comm206 (talk) 04:20, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

[edit]

Hi, guys! Your article looks good. The organization is well done and nicely sourced. Some critiques I had were some wordings sounding like advertising for Threewalls rather than stating information about them. Additionally, there's grammar errors found throughout the whole article. I like your choice of non-profit and the formatting of your article, too, though. My peer review goes more into detail about everything I liked or critiqued. I'm excited to see your end product! Lycheewiki (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

[edit]

Hello! I'm very impressed with the amount of information about your organization and the Wikipedia page's overall organization! The tone was neutral and your sourcing was appropriate. A critique I have on the article are the occasional grammar issues throughout as well as run-on sentences that could be edited to be more concise. You can find more details on my peer review page. Overall, I appreciate your findings and coverage on Threewalls and the good that they've done! I'm excited for the final draft! Lowkeysesame (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply