Talk:Three Castles

Three Castles has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 2, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Three Castles/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I will take this one, comments to follow in next few days. Zawed (talk) 03:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Very nicely written, I did a couple of tweaks in one section so please check you are OK with them. The only (minor) issues I picked up:

"In 1135, a major Welsh revolt took place...": is there a specific article that the Welsh revolt could be linked to? I assume there isn't but just wanted to check.
link Llywelyn ap Gruffudd?
link William de Braose?
retrieval date for note 21?
Images all appear to be appropriately tagged.
There is one dupe link, to Edward I, but the first mention is actually to him as a prince with the second being when he was king so I would be inclined to let that slide.
DAB link to White Castle
External links check OK

Looks good as always Hchc2009. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 06:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Cheers! All done, bar the Welsh revolt, which doesn't seem to have a good target link that I can find... Hchc2009 (talk) 08:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I consider this article to be well-written in a neutral tone and sourced appropriately. Passing as GA. Zawed (talk) 09:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

GA Review