Talk:The Selfish Genius

Philosophy: Literature / Science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of science

Notability has been established by an ongoing development of the page, further developments could include more details on the chapters and links and references to the more complex arguments and criticism surrounding the book.Lunar 564 (talk) 23:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Capitals

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There's too much random capitalization of words (e.g. The book provides an oversight of the Historical and Philosophical debates that have continued throughout the history of Evolutionary Theory). Richard001 (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Capitals