Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:The Problem Solverz/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Johanna in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 15:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Third on my "to review" list. Johanna(talk to me!) 15:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Comments
  • Instead of "from Cartoon Network", I would say "which aired on Cartoon Network".
  • You can remove "problem-solving" as that's what detectives are by definition
  • "Jones is a member of the art collective Paper Rad." This sentence comes out of nowhere, and I don't see how it's relevant.
  • I notice nothing about the series' cancellation from CN's or Netflix's schedules, both in the lead and the article. Could you include something?
  • What do you mean that the characters were created "as a response"?
  • "For television Jones..." how is this relevant, particularly to what you were just discussing?
  • It's up to you, but I wouldn't add that Adult Swim is the nightly division of the network.
  • "The plan was pulled off..." A lot of things wrong here. First, this phrasing is informal. Also, what "plan", and who was involved? I'm confused.
  • "Writing was the lengthiest facet" I'm a bit confused
  • It seems like critics have noted the bright art style, but unless a specific one has made the comparison to Paper Rad, I would remove that part from the image caption.
  • Remove the clause "Rather than battle it" and separate the two remaining independent clauses with a semicolon.
  • I would add the critical consensus back at the top of "Reception".
  • Your refs are impeccable. For an article of this length, I don't think I've seen such consistently reliable and well-formatted sources. None of them are broken. Nice job on that!