Talk:The Nut Job

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Canadian / Korean / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Canada: Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal Canada notice board This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Could someone make an article for The Nut Job 2 that is set for release in 2016?

Here are some links about this film: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3486626/ http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_nut_job_2/ http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/113912-the-nut-job-2-is-coming-on-january-15-2016#/slide/1 http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-the-nut-job-2-sequel-announced-20140123-story.html http://variety.com/2014/film/news/nut-job-2-set-for-jan-15-2016-1201068101/ Greshthegreat (talk)

Untitled

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Is there any particular reason why Surly is called a "purple squirrel" when he's obviously a black squirrel that sometimes looks purple in the light? 74.77.27.153 (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
- If you actually look at some of the pictures flying around on Google Images you'll see he's actually purple. Also, see the purple squirrel article, I think it offers some insight into why he's a purple squirrel.75.156.68.5 (talk) 03:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
- That's why I'm asking. I've been all over Google Images and about half of them show him with bright purple fur. In the others, he's distinctly black. It's very confusing. 74.77.24.150 (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reviews

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

For the NPR review the article says, "If you're able to forgive the movie's occasionally nutty (and groan-worthy) jokes, it delivers an interesting and satisfying answer." This doesn't sound like a strictly positive review at all, and I would go as far to classify this as mixed. Even the existing quote, "Once Surly and Buddy case the joint, develop a plan, and deal with the inevitable surprises, The Nut Job could be any classic caper flick." doesn't even sound positive either. Just throwing that out there because I find it really strange. 75.156.68.5 (talk) 03:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone notice it was copyrighted in 2013 at the end of the credits. when it was actually debuted in 2014?

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

yes it was. from Videomadman xxxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.92.47 (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Critical reception