Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Test fixture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Keemen90, Ajaypendyala.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Scope of article

[edit]

In physical testing a test fixture is a device for holding a specimen during a test. This is a oommonly used term. I can either add this to the article or I could change the title of this article to clearly limit its scope to software testing. I could then start a new article on the test fixtures used in physical testing. Comments? Pkgx (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The only response since 19 January was for an editor adding elctronics test fixtures. I will create three sections to clarify this for readers. Pkgx (talk) 16:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Updating Software section

[edit]

We plan to:

  • Update the definition
  • Add a section on how fixtures are setup
  • Add Advantages and Disadvantages section
  • Add section on typical bad smells found in test fixtures

Keemen90 (talk) 03:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Do not simply add bullet points. Write content in prose. Also, don't use one or two references, as you have done, use multiple, reliable sources. Using books rather than articles would also be better as they tend to gather content from multiple sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
We've just added the subsections back so that the prose could be better understood. @Keemen90 has improved the references as you'd suggested. Ajaypendyala (talk) 01:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Well you violated MOS:HEADING and short sections (two paragraphs per section) is not appropriate. There isn't much needed to understand in these short sections. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply