Talk:Telecinema
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Marshall46 in topic Spelling
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Merge?
[edit]Just wondering how much there is to say about the Telekinema, and would it make more sense to merge it into the main NFT article? I've no great opinion either way, but it should be discussed. Le Deluge (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think we should keep it separate, as is. The reason is that it's of very little relevance to the NFT, but it's of rather more interest to the FoB, for which the NFT would be an anachronism. After all, what's wrong with small articles? Would a larger NFT article with this content swamped inside it (then deleted for WP:UNDUE) actually be any better? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Spelling
[edit]In the guide to the South Bank Exhibition, it is spelled "Telecinema". Where was it ever spelled "Telekinema"? Marshall46 (talk) 14:24, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- And in Hansard. And in the BFI research project "Telekinema" is a careless mistake, so I am going to move. Marshall46 (talk) 14:28, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not such a careless mistake. In photos, the sign above the door says, "Telekinema", even though it was referred to as "Telecinema" in contemporary literature. Marshall46 (talk) 21:25, 1 December 2011 (UTC)