Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Taurus (ruler)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Lone-078 in topic Taurus’ flourishing - My estimates

Bull astrological age

[edit]

I think it's strange that nobody has said the Age of Taurus spans approximately the period between 4400 and 2200 BC. It is the age defined by the Sun being in the constellation of Taurus on the spring equinox and happens to correspond with the datings of the "first Pharaoh"... ConfusedEnoch (talk) 09:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Probably because no one noticed besides you (sorry for replying 4 years late) Emmanuelbruh (talk) 03:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Taurus’ flourishing - My estimates

[edit]

Scorpion I [Taurus’ possible predecessor]’s flourishing is regarded on Wikipedia as circa 3275 B.C., this could put Taurus’ flourishing at circa 3330–3290 B.C.

We also have to state the fact that these people may not be noticed if they were not impactful, so I will say each individuals was born at least 15 years before their successor. This is also due to that their successor may be their son.

Iry-Hor’s flourishing is regarded on Wikipedia as circa 3170 B.C., in which Bull’s successors to Iry-Hor follow as; Scorpion I, Double Falcon, Iry-Hor. Using previous estimations across three generations; I estimate, using this, that Taurus flourished circa 3330–3290 B.C., Scorpion I’s as circa 3275–3235 B.C., Double Falcon’s as circa 3235–3185 B.C., and Iry-Hor’s as 3170 B.C. Each of these have a 40 year difference between the earliest and latest possible point that I've explained Both are equal to 3330–3290 B.C., just noting that. However a more realistic estimate for Taurus could be circa 3280 B.C.Newaccount33333 (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

WP:OR would be worth a read, once and for all. Lone-078 (talk) 17:28, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply