Talk:TV Everywhere/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 21:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Me again. 23W 21:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Performed these copy edits; dupdet spotchecks return no bulk close paraphrasing.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Please remember to include relevant bibliographical information in your citations.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I've added this logo; I think it oughta make things look spiffy.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Specific

• Per WP:LEADLENGTH, the lead should be one or two paragraphs.
• Some direct quotes require citations directly afterwards (WP:MINREF); I've tagged them using {{citation needed}}.

That's pretty much it, I think. Nice work (again). Hold for a fortnight. 23W 01:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Addressed. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Noice. 23W 02:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)