Talk:SynthMaster

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems with the article

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

This article mostly reads like a product Release History from a commercial website.
It information is stale: there's nothing newer than early 2012 reported in it. And in a fast-moving field like consumer-level music software, the four years that have elapsed since then is usually two to three full generations of product.
It has far too much detail that's irrelevant for an encyclopaedia article.
Some phrasing is not idiomatic plain English, but probably preserves a German original.
It gives no information on pricing.
It doesn't compare the product with competitors.
By listing only product features, and not addressing any shortcomings, it fails to offer a Neutral Point of View (NPOV).

Having said all that, it's a good start towards a potentially useful article. I can't improve it with respect to my last two criticisms. Can you? yoyo (talk) 15:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

- Well, for a start, I am going to remove the section about the improvements in the old beta version of the software. Yes, this will blank a section, but it is a section which needs blanking. 159.83.183.168 (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

I agree with everything which has been written previously. This article needs to be rewritten using up-to-date information. AvinashMeetoo (talk) 11:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Looking over the edit history, it's also hard to escape the conclusion that 90% of this article was written by a user who is almost certainly associated with the company that produces the software, making it a clear WP:COI violation practically right from launch.

Given that, on top of all its other issues, I begin to wonder if notability has even been sufficiently established for the topic. Right now we're just hosting a software vendor's (9-year-old) advertisement, effectively. Maybe the best fix is to just take this thing to AfD for ritual vaporization. -- FeRDNYC (talk) 05:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Problems with the article