Talk:Sync (Unix)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Fsync linux controversy

Should be added (2018) https://lwn.net/Articles/752063/

Comment

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I read somewhere a while ago that some modern hard drives may no longer honour a 'sync' call properly; i.e. the OS flushes all of its pending writes to disk, but the disk doesn't obey the call to flush all of its internal memory buffer to disk also. This can make power outages more likely to cause problems, as the OS may rely on its last regularly scheduled sync call having done what it was supposed to. The only article I could find about this was http://www.jasonbrome.com/blog/archives/2004/04/03/writecache_enabled.html , but I don't think that's the one I was thinking of. 96.50.106.54 (talk) 02:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

This article conflates several related and overlapping topics: sync; fsync; and fdatasync. I think a better job could be done of keeping them distinct and making sure they aren't confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alan.A.Mick (talk • contribs) 20:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Fsync linux controversy

Comment