Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Sweet Sulphur Springs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Katzrockso in topic State today?

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:55, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Postcard of Sweet Sulphur Springs from about 1909
Postcard of Sweet Sulphur Springs from about 1909
Created by Katzrockso (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Katzrockso (talk) 06:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC).Reply

Katzrockso, thank you for a nice interesting article which is eligible: long enough, recent enough, well sourced. I even like the hook (which is rare)! I'd drop "once" because it sems to have been so for a while. - There are a few things in the article I'd do differently, - please tell me if you'd agree, - it's not required for DYK. I'd give it an infobox, - check similar articles and adapt from there perhaps. I'd move all references away from the lead to where the facts are mentioned in the body. I'd remove the links to small newspapers which won't get an article easily, and if not that, at least avoid to have two red links to the same one ;) - I also believe that the hook would be more attractive with that postcard image. Again, can you look at other nominations and see how that is done? If not, I can help you with it. Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your reply Gerda Arendt and your positive comments! I originally had some sources in the lead because I was still working on making sure that article was following WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY; I had some details in the lead that weren't mentioned in the body and there were sources that were only in the lead. I will double check that this issue has been resolved and remove the lead sources shortly. I will remove the redlinks, when I was adding the sources I didn't know these didn't have an article. As for an infobox, I am not sure that articles like this usually have them. There's one for Idylease Inn, though it doesn't have too much detail. I have never dealt with infoboxes before so I will try to see if I can mess around with it and see what works.
As for changing the hook, I'm not sure. It thought it was important to highlight that it doesn't exist anymore - I don't think people really know about this historic hotel anymore, the most recent coverage on it is from the 1980s. As for the image, I'll have to take a look. Katzrockso (talk) 22:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, sounds all good, and you made great changes already, I'll watch. (I wrote about a spa place once, Kurhaus, Wiesbaden.) If you say "was" it should be clear that it's past, a postcard image would show the same, but for more clarity you could add "around 1900", better in some ALT1. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the image! I moved the source further down, and added (depicted) to the hook. (Normally it's (pictured), but for paintings and such the other is better. For you next nom.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The image is licensed and a good illustration of the period. - Please keep this nomination on your watchlist until it is closed and the hook moved to a prep. You can then watch that prep, and later the queue of the same number where it will land shortly before appearing. The over-all queue has the calendar showing when it will appear. Looking forward to DYK day, and to your next offer here! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

State today?

[edit]

An interesting article. What is the condition of the site today, 70 years on from it being reported as a meadow? Do the springs still exist? Stronach (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I didn't find any reliable sources that say anything about the current state of the area, unfortunately. I suspect it is probably in a forested area somewhere abandoned; could possibly figure out coordinates and check on Google Maps, but that might veer into WP:OR. Katzrockso (talk) 13:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply