Talk:Surface Pro 2
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Surface Pro 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Merge
[edit]Why not merge this with the Surface 2 article? They have almost the exact same info barring the technical specifications and operating system.
- Oppose, those two differences are large enough. The biggest difference is the Surface 2 runs Windows RT and the Pro 2 runs full Windows. Also, each device will get different reviews, so two articles will help understand the differences. Frmorrison (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Possible bias.
[edit]I believe that the "reception" category is showing a certain amount of bias against the device and showing only one side of general opinions. I realize not all discussions are balanced, but this seems entirely too balanced toward one (negative) side.80.47.255.119 (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Not just possible bias. And what is funny is that unlike the original Surface Pro, the vast majority of the reviews I've seen for the Pro 2 have been positive. This editor must have gone out of their way to just sift out the negative. --147.108.253.252 (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Renaming page to title with "Microsoft" brand name
[edit]I read the Microsoft Surface article earlier and decided to head to the Surface Pro 2 article. When I first read the article, I found out that the "Microsoft" brand name was missing in the article's title. So do you think the right move will be to move this article and Surface 2 to a page with the "Microsoft" brand name preceding the two product names? Will it be right to move Surface 2 to Microsoft Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 to Microsoft Surface Pro 2? Hope someone answers this in no time. Thanks. Japanese Rail Fan (talk) 08:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Discussion moved to Talk:Surface 2 due to similarities in topic. For other comments, please comment there. Thanks. Japanese Rail Fan (talk) 14:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Surface 2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Standardize all the Surface articles
[edit]All of the Surface articles are currently very incoherent.
I propose that we standardize on a common structure.
See: Talk:Microsoft Surface Pro 3#Standardize all the Surface articles Illegal Operation (talk) 22:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)