Talk:Surface Mini

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Surface Mini/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 21:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello I will be reviewing this article. Expect comments soon. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 21:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

General comments

• No pictures. While it is encouraged, it is technically not required. I would see if its possible to acquire an image via WP:NFCC.
• All references seem reliable.
• Copyvio check came back clean

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Discussion

• While no images, the rest of the article meets the criteria for GA. I will be promoting it, although I do ask that you please try to acquire an image for this article. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 22:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)